DSH HUB
HomePlugin StorePlugin PacksCommunityRankingsResourcesPublish Guide
Plugin source
Back to catalog

sugarxl /

sugarxl/dsh-safety

Verified

Safety harness plugin for DeepSeek Harness (DSH): execution-time guard, trash-based safe_delete, composition snapshots & rollback, pre-restart validation. Standalone CLI, zero dependencies.

★ 1 Stars0 Forks0 IssuesN/A Community rating0 Confirmed installs
View on GitHub
READMESource: main@3fd8e7c0

dsh-safety

English | 中文

license   dependencies   node   npm version   npm downloads   github release   stars   last commit   ci

Filesystem safety harness for DeepSeek Harness
execution-time guard · user-gated approvals · trash-based deletes · composition snapshots · pre-restart checks · standalone CLI

What · Features · Approval workflow · Install · Quick start · CLI · Tools · Config · How it works · Structure · Testing · Troubleshooting · Security · Design · FAQ · Known limitations

What

A filesystem safety harness for DeepSeek Harness (DSH). It enforces a three-tier file policy at the tool-execution boundary and, crucially, makes the agent ask the human before it deletes or rewrites anything important:

  • destructive agent calls are denied before they run, with an educational message explaining what the target is, why it matters, and what the sanctioned alternative is;
  • every delete is routed through a recoverable trash;
  • the plugin composition can be snapshotted and rolled back transactionally;
  • the composition is validated before a restart;
  • sensitive deletes/writes require a one-shot, time-limited user approval — the model can never authorize itself.

The package has zero runtime dependencies. It installs as a standard DSH profile bundle and also ships a standalone CLI, so the recovery and approval layer remains usable even when DSH itself will not start.

Background — the guard rules are derived from a real production incident: a script silently resolved the wrong path (PowerShell's $HOME is read-only) and Remove-Item -Recurse -Force deleted an entire engine runtime root. The directory was recoverable only because it was generated content; hand-authored files would have been lost permanently. The plugin turns the lessons of that incident into enforced mechanisms rather than documentation.

Features

  • Execution-time guard (ctx.tools.guard) — denies destructive tool calls before they run.
    • Recursive directory deletes (rm -r/-rf, Remove-Item -Recurse, rd /s, rmdir, shutil.rmtree, fs.rm recursive, require('fs').rmSync…) are denied by default and routed to safe_delete (trash, undoable). In cooperative mode a human-granted approval can authorize a free-path recursive shell delete.
    • write/edit/str_replace_editor on protected paths (profile package.json, cordis.patch.yml, cordis.yml, lockfiles, node_modules, the deployment install dir, home patch/settings) are denied unless the user has granted an approval.
    • Deletes on confirm zones (the whole OS home dir, plugin sources, agent presets) are denied and require a granted user approval.
    • run_code bodies are scanned too — arbitrary code execution cannot hide an fs.rmSync/shutil.rmtree on a protected zone behind a tool call boundary.
    • Variable-reference deletes are caught — Remove-Item "$env:USERPROFILE\.dsh\…" whose literal path only exists after expansion is denied (the reference + tail fragment is matched against protected markers).
  • Educational, anti-bypass denials — a blocked call returns why it was blocked, what the target is, what the consequence would be, and what the sanctioned path is; the system prompt tells the agent to stop trying workarounds and ask the user instead; after repeated blocks for the same target the guard escalates with an explicit STOP.
  • User-gated approval system — safety_ask creates a structured request (what / why / consequence / alternative); the human approves via dsh-safety allow <id> (or dsh-safety delete --force); the approval is one-shot, time-limited, audited, and serialized across processes by an atomic lock. The model can never grant itself one — a force:true flag alone is not an approval. Every request also carries a system-computed consequence (from the real path classification) shown separately from the model's self-report, so the human approves on a system-backed verdict.
  • safe_delete — the only sanctioned delete channel. Moves to a trash directory (recoverable via safety_undo), preview:true shows what would be removed first, refuses filesystem roots and its own state dir, and journals every delete.
  • Composition snapshots — safety_snapshot saves the whole plugin composition (per-profile manifests, patches, lockfiles, plugin package.json + cordis.patch.yml, agent presets) with SHA-256 hashes; safety_restore rolls back to a last-known-good state transactionally (current files are backed up first; a failed rollback never leaves the composition half-restored). Credential-bearing files are excluded by default.
  • Pre-restart check — safety_check validates UTF-8, detects mojibake (wrong-encoding round-trips, the classic "DSH won't open" cause), JSON parse errors, and duplicate plugin row ids across patch layers (the "one row, one layer" rule).
  • Audit journal — every block/approval/delete/snapshot/restore is journaled and readable via safety_journal / safety_status.
  • Standalone CLI — dsh-safety works without DSH: policy / delete / undo / snapshot / restore / check / approve from your own terminal, even when DSH won't boot.

Approval workflow

The whole point of the approval system is that the model can never approve its own destructive calls. A flag it can set (force:true) is not a confirmation — only a human action (CLI) is.

agent calls delete/write on a confirm/protected zone
        │
        ▼
guard BLOCKS it (educational message: what / why / consequence / sanctioned path)
        │
        ▼
agent calls safety_ask { path, kind, what, why, consequence, alternative }
        │   → creates a request (the SYSTEM also computes an authoritative
        │     consequence from the real path classification), returns an id
        ▼
agent tells the user:  "please approve: dsh-safety allow <id>"
        │
        ▼
USER runs  dsh-safety allow <id>        (or: dsh-safety delete --force)
        │   → grants a one-shot, time-limited approval (default 5 min)
        ▼
agent retries the original call → guard consumes the approval and LETS IT THROUGH
        │   (the approval is now spent; a second call is blocked again)
        ▼
everything is audited: who requested, who approved, when, when it was consumed

Practical details:

  • Requesting: when a call is blocked, the denial message tells the agent to call safety_ask with the causality. The request carries what/why/consequence/alternative and a system-computed systemNote — dsh-safety approvals shows the [system] verdict and the (model: …) self-report separately, so you approve on the system's classification, not the model's unverifiable story.
  • Approving: dsh-safety allow <id> approves an agent-created request. dsh-safety allow --path <p> --kind delete|write [--recursive] creates and approves one directly (you are the human). dsh-safety delete --force on a confirm/protected path also grants the approval it needs and then moves the item to trash.
  • One-shot: an approval is consumed by the first matching call (exact kind + exact target; recursive approvals are exact on the flag and may be target-agnostic). After that it is spent.
  • Time-limited: a granted approval expires after approvalTtlMs (default 5 minutes) and must be re-granted.
  • Approved calls run as written — safe_delete is the trash channel: an approved raw retry (e.g. a Remove-Item re-run) executes as-is; that is exactly what the human authorized. If you want the operation recoverable, have the agent use safe_delete (always trash, undoable) instead of raw shell. Recursive raw deletes on protected/confirm paths are never approvable via raw shell — they always go through safe_delete.
  • Strict vs cooperative: in mode: strict (default), raw recursive shell deletes are never approvable — the only way to remove a directory tree is safe_delete (trash, undoable). In mode: cooperative, the human can authorize a free-path recursive shell delete with a generic recursive approval (dsh-safety allow --path … --recursive).
  • Anti-loop: if the agent retries the same blocked target repeatedly, the guard escalates and tells it to stop and ask the user.

Install

System requirements: a working DeepSeek Harness (dsh web boots). npm install has no extra requirements; installing from the repository needs Node.js >= 22 and pnpm.

From npm (recommended)

dsh plugin --profile web add @suagr_xl/dsh-safety   # install from the official npm registry / 从官方 npm registry 安装

dsh plugin runs pnpm and reconciles dsh.profile.bundles automatically because this package declares dsh.bundle. Restart dsh web — the guard is then active and the safety_* tools appear.

From the repository (development)

git clone https://github.com/sugarxl/dsh-safety.git   # clone the repo / 克隆仓库
cd dsh-safety                                         # enter the directory / 进入目录
dsh plugin --profile web add link:$(pwd)              # symlink the repo into the profile / 把仓库软链进 profile

The link: protocol symlinks the repo (changes to lib/ apply after a restart), unlike file: which copies a snapshot. dsh plugin reconciles the bundle automatically. Note: the profile directory is not a pnpm workspace, so any workspace:* deps would fall back to the npm registry — this plugin has zero runtime dependencies at all (its imports are only Node builtins + its own safety-core.mjs/state.mjs/audit.mjs), so a bare link: install works with no node_modules of its own and no fallback is needed.

Where it lands (official layout)

Both installs go through the official dsh plugin mechanism — nothing else to configure:

$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>/package.json                # + dependency + dsh.profile.bundles / 新增依赖 + dsh.profile.bundles
$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>/node_modules/@suagr_xl/dsh-safety/    # the installed package / 安装的包本体

The bundle layer is read at boot from the package's own cordis.patch.yml. The dsh-safety row id appears in exactly one layer (that file); never add it to the profile or home cordis.patch.yml.

Verify & uninstall

dsh --profile web --dump-config | grep -i dsh-safety   # row present / 确认行出现
dsh-safety check                                        # pre-restart gate / 重启前体检
# restart dsh web / 重启 dsh web

# uninstall: / 卸载:
dsh plugin --profile web remove @suagr_xl/dsh-safety
# restart dsh web / 重启 dsh web

Install troubleshooting

  • Installed, restarted, but nothing changed: restart the whole dsh web process — a page refresh is not enough. Confirm the row is mounted with dsh --profile web --dump-config.
  • ERR_PNPM_IGNORED_BUILDS: pnpm blocks dependency build scripts; add the listed packages to pnpm-workspace.yaml allowBuilds and re-run.
  • pnpm release-age gate installs an old version: pnpm 11's minimumReleaseAge can silently pick an older publish within ~10 days; add minimumReleaseAgeExclude: ['@suagr_xl/dsh-safety'] to the profile's pnpm-workspace.yaml and run dsh plugin --profile web update @suagr_xl/dsh-safety.

Standalone CLI (no plugin install needed)

npm link   # or: node bin/dsh-safety.mjs ...
dsh-safety status

The CLI reads the same $DSH_HOME/.dsh-safety state the plugin uses, so you can approve/undo/restore from your terminal even if DSH is down.

Quick start

# 1. Inspect the effective policy zones
dsh-safety policy

# 2. Snapshot before editing any composition file
dsh-safety snapshot before-edit

# 3. Delete through the safe channel (preview first, then execute)
dsh-safety delete path/to/file --preview      # free path — just works
dsh-safety delete path/to/file                # moves to trash (undoable)
dsh-safety delete path/to/important --force   # confirm/protected zone:
                                              #   --force IS the human approval here

# 4. Recover a delete
dsh-safety trash
dsh-safety undo <trash-id>

# 5. Boot failure: validate, then roll back
dsh-safety check
dsh-safety status          # list snapshots + pending approvals
dsh-safety restore <snapshot-id> --confirm

# 6. Approve a request the agent created (model asked via safety_ask)
dsh-safety approvals
dsh-safety allow <request-id>

CLI reference

dsh-safety status                  state: trash, snapshots, approvals, journal
dsh-safety delete <path> [--force] [--preview]
dsh-safety trash [--limit N]
dsh-safety undo <id>
dsh-safety snapshot [label] [--exclude a,b]
dsh-safety restore <id> --confirm
dsh-safety check                   exit 1 on failure (CI-friendly)
dsh-safety journal [n]
dsh-safety policy                  effective policy zones
dsh-safety approvals               list pending/granted approval requests
dsh-safety allow <id>              approve a request the agent created
dsh-safety allow --path <p> [--kind delete|write] [--recursive]   approve a new one directly
dsh-safety revoke <id>             revoke a request
dsh-safety help

--home <path> overrides the state root ($DSH_HOME or ~/.dsh by default).

The plugin's configured roots live in the cordis patch layers, which a standalone CLI cannot read — so delete/policy accept the same overrides to align with the running guard:

--write-root <path>      add a protected (no write/edit/delete) root
--confirm-root <path>    add a confirm-delete (trash-only) root
--no-home-confirm        do NOT make the whole OS home a confirm zone
--keep-trash=N / --keep-snapshots=N    retention caps after delete/snapshot

The CLI is the human side of the approval flow: dsh-safety delete --force and dsh-safety allow are REAL user authorizations (recorded in state); the model can never grant itself an approval.

Model-facing tools (when installed as a plugin)

Tool Purpose
safe_delete trash-based delete (preview / user approval / undoable). force:true is NOT a user approval — the deletion needs a granted approval first
safety_ask request the user's approval with the causality (what / why / consequence / alternative); the user approves via dsh-safety allow <id>
safety_trash / safety_undo list trash / restore an item
safety_snapshot / safety_restore snapshot composition / rollback (confirm:true)
safety_check pre-restart validation (UTF-8 / mojibake / JSON / duplicate ids)
safety_journal / safety_status audit log / state (incl. pending approvals)

Configuration

Configure via the bundle row in a patch layer (e.g. the profile's cordis.patch.yml):

- id: dsh-safety
  config:
    blockWriteRoots: ["C:\\extra\\protected"]
    confirmDeleteRoots: ["D:\\data"]
    snapshotExclude: ["settings.yaml", ".credentials.yaml"]
    blockWrites: true
    blockShellDestructive: true
    audit: true
    keepTrash: 200
    keepSnapshots: 10
    mode: strict            # strict | cooperative
    approvalTtlMs: 300000   # approval validity window (5 min default)
Field Default Meaning
blockWriteRoots profile manifests/patches/lockfiles/node_modules, install dir, home patch/settings no write/edit/delete
confirmDeleteRoots $HOME, profiles/*, .agent-presets no delete without a granted user approval (still trash-only)
snapshotExclude ["settings.yaml", ".credentials.yaml"] files never copied into snapshots
blockWrites true enable the write/edit guard
blockShellDestructive true enable the shell-delete guard
audit true journal destructive tool calls
keepTrash / keepSnapshots 200 / 10 retention limits
mode strict strict: recursive shell deletes are never approvable; cooperative: the human can authorize them via the approval flow
approvalTtlMs 300000 how long a granted approval stays valid before it must be re-granted

How it works

Three-tier policy:

Tier Allowed Denied Default coverage
protected read write / edit / delete (unless a user approval is granted) profile package.json/cordis.patch.yml/cordis.yml/lockfiles/node_modules, install dir, home patch & settings
confirm read, edit delete (needs a granted user approval) entire $HOME, plugin sources, agent presets
free read/write/delete recursive delete (approvable in cooperative mode) regular workspace files

The guard decision chain, per tool call: destructive verb? → is it a recursive delete? → does an explicit path hit a protected/confirm zone? → does a variable-reference fragment ($env:X\…, %X%\…, ${X}/…) expand into a protected zone? → does the command text hit a protected marker (~/relative forms)? → run_code code bodies go through the same chain. A matching, granted user approval lets the call through once; otherwise it is denied.

Denials are educational: they name the target, describe it, explain the consequence (e.g. "rewriting this can make DSH fail to boot") and the sanctioned path (safe_delete / safety_ask), and tell the agent not to try workarounds. Repeated blocks for the same target escalate to an explicit STOP. Denials are journaled and returned to the model as errors (never a crash).

A second layer hooks the fs/write-intent / fs/edit-intent waterfalls and throws FS_DENIED on protected paths regardless of which tool writes.

buildPolicy lives in safety-core.mjs and is shared by the plugin guard and the standalone CLI, so the two surfaces can never drift apart. restoreSnapshot is transactional: it backs up live files first, then copies snapshot files back, and rolls the whole thing back if either phase fails — a failed rollback never leaves the composition half-restored. Approval state lives in $DSH_HOME/.dsh-safety/state.json, shared by the guard, safe_delete and the CLI.

Structure

dsh-safety/
├── bin/
│   └── dsh-safety.mjs        # standalone CLI (zero deps)
├── lib/
│   ├── safety-core.mjs       # pure logic: policy/guard/trash/snapshot/check
│   ├── index.js              # host half: tools, guard, fs hooks
│   ├── state.mjs             # persisted state (approvals, guard counters) — wired into index.js
│   ├── audit.mjs             # JSONL audit log + threshold alerts — wired into index.js
│   ├── policy.mjs            # policy refinement utilities (symlink/mount detection, exported)
│   └── snapshot-store.mjs    # incremental snapshot utilities (baseline/delta, exported)
├── test/
│   ├── safety.test.mjs       # unit tests: core guard/trash/snapshot/check
│   ├── state.test.mjs        # state persistence + approval lifecycle
│   ├── audit.test.mjs        # audit log + alerts
│   ├── policy.test.mjs       # policy refinement
│   ├── snapshot-store.test.mjs # incremental snapshots
│   └── harness.mjs           # integration checks (clean checkout, zero deps)
├── cordis.patch.yml          # bundle patch (inserts the dsh-safety row)
├── package.json              # dsh.bundle + bin
├── install.ps1 / recover.ps1 # local convenience scripts (snapshot→install→verify→rollback)
├── README.md / README.zh.md  # docs (bilingual, officially paired)
└── LICENSE / NOTICE / SECURITY.md

Testing

npm test                        # all unit tests (core + state/audit/policy/snapshot-store)
node test/harness.mjs           # integration checks, clean checkout (no @deepseek-ai needed)
npm run check                   # syntax checks on every lib/bin module

Current suite: 68 unit tests + the integration harness, green on Windows and Linux CI (Node 22 and 24).

Troubleshooting

  • DSH won't boot after a plugin change: run dsh-safety check to find mojibake / JSON / duplicate-id problems; dsh --profile web --dump-default-config to see the bundle layer without the user layer; dsh-safety restore <id> --confirm to roll back a snapshot.
  • The guard blocks something legitimate: the guard never blocks reads or edits of plugin sources; it blocks deletes on $HOME/plugin/config zones and asks the human for approval. Use safe_delete (undoable) instead of raw rm; for a confirm/protected path, let the agent create a safety_ask request and approve it with dsh-safety allow <id>.
  • A protected path needs to be deleted: from the CLI, dsh-safety delete <path> --force — the CLI user is the human, so --force is a real approval and the item still goes to trash, never permanent. From the model side, a granted approval is required (force:true alone is not enough).
  • The agent keeps trying workarounds after a block: that is exactly what the guard is built to stop. Tell it to call safety_ask and wait for your approval, or deny the request.

Security

See SECURITY.md for the full threat model. In short: the guard intercepts model tool calls, not commands you run in your own terminal; run_code scanning is text-based and can be outsmarted by dynamic/obfuscated code; approval records in state.json can be tampered with by a same-process plugin. It is a safety net, not a sandbox — configure DSH's own sandbox/approval for real containment, and use this plugin for the recovery and ask-the-human layer DSH lacks.

License

MIT. Integration patterns modeled after DeepSeek Harness (MIT); see NOTICE.

—/ 5

No ratings yet

Verified DSH bundle

Commit 3fd8e7c09e01

Community comments

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

DSH HUB

A community index for DSH plugins. Not an official GitHub or DeepSeek AI product.

CommunityResourcesAPIAbout