Spec-Driven Development for Odoo

---

⚡ Summary

dsh-odoo-sdd turns DeepSeek Harness into a specification-driven (SDD) Odoo development pipeline. Two ideas hold it together:

• Closed feedback loop — the agent installs and upgrades modules, reads the server traceback and retries against a real, running Odoo instance. The plugin never starts Docker or odoo-bin: you point it at an instance you already have (dev/staging) through a gitignored .env, and the tools speak plain JSON-RPC.
• Pipeline safety — every phase persists to disk, the gates are fail-closed on an explicit APPROVED marker, three consecutive failures force a root-cause diagnosis, verify/fix iterations are capped, stop.md halts everything, and verdicts are honest: a failed verification is persisted as FAILED and can never be reported as success.
• No change without a spec — a request that arrives after the pipeline closed ("now also change X" in the same chat) is a new change, so it gets its own (small) spec or an explicit waiver from you. The guard covers instance mutations and source edits alike, and says which of the three ways out is available instead of quietly editing.

[!NOTE] What it is not: an infrastructure orchestrator, a credential manager over chat, or an auto-committer. It writes no commit and never asks you for a password.

Requirements

Need	Why
DSH ≥ 0.1.2-rc.1 on Node ≥ 20	the plugin mounts as a Cordis bundle and uses the tools service
An existing Odoo instance reachable over HTTP(S)	the loop needs a real server to install into and read tracebacks from
A disposable dev/staging database	verification installs modules and writes test data
(optional) a Playwright browser tool	only for the UI layer of verification and for narrated-manual captures; without it those scenarios are marked for manual checking
(optional) playwright-core ≥ 1.63.0	ships with the plugin as an optional dependency; the capture motor drives Chromium, Chrome or Edge, and answers NEEDS_BROWSER with the one-line remedy when none is present

---

🔭 How it works

flowchart TD
    A(["Idea or request"]) --> C1["1 CLARIFY<br/>interview and security questions"]
    C1 --> R2["2 READ_SPEC<br/>immutable spec.md"]
    R2 -->|APPROVED| A3["3 ARCHITECTURE<br/>models, views, security, test plan"]
    A3 -->|APPROVED| W4["4 WRITE_CODE<br/>module source and OCA docs"]
    W4 --> V5["5 VERIFY<br/>static, install, RPC, UI"]
    V5 -->|PASSED| D9(["handoff.md - DONE"])
    V5 -->|FAILED| F6["FIX_LOOP<br/>root cause, max 5 iterations"]
    F6 --> V5
    W4 -.-> M7["odoo_module install or upgrade"]
    M7 -.->|traceback| E8["odoo_errors"]
    E8 -.-> F6

The specification is the single source of truth and it is immutable: the code adapts to the spec, never the other way around. Gates are human-answered by default, and can be delegated to a human-proxy agent when you choose the autonomous mode.

---

✨ Key features

• 🎯 Spec before code, always. spec.md carries numbered acceptance criteria; DONE is unreachable without a persisted PASSED verdict on disk.
• 🧬 Stable requirement identity. Every requirement block gets a stable REQ-<AREA>-NN id (section slug + ordinal) plus a fingerprint committed to req-baseline.json. Rewording a requirement under an existing id is DRIFT: the advance is refused until you either revert it or accept it explicitly (sdd_phase operation=baseline), so a plan or a test never silently refers to a requirement that no longer says what it said.
• 🔗 Bidirectional coverage. Annotate code and tests with # REQ-<AREA>-NN and odoo_validate module_dir=… spec_dir=… checks both directions — requirements with no implementation, and orphaned annotations whose id the spec no longer declares. Floors: must/shall block at 1.0, should is reported at 0.8, may is informational. Each requirement lands on the ladder covered / untested / test-only / unimplemented.
• 🔍 Ambiguity lint (advisory). mark_spec_loaded reports unquantified adjectives, vague quantifiers, TBD placeholders, passives with no actor and and/or compounds, each with a concrete rewrite — advice, never a gate.
• 🧪 Tests that can actually fail. odoo_tests checks the suite an install log cannot see: a test file Odoo never imports (nothing loads it), a test that asserts nothing, a swallowed exception, cr.commit() breaking the per-test rollback, time.sleep, skips — and maps every acceptance criterion to the test that mentions it. scaffold writes RED stubs (they raise until implemented) instead of vacuous passes.
• 🔴 RED before GREEN on a bug fix. In mode=bug the pipeline refuses to leave WRITE_CODE until test-plan.md records the reproduction that FAILED first (red (evidence: …), or pass (red first: …) once fixed) — a regression test that never failed proves nothing.
• 🔁 A real feedback loop. odoo_module install returns the server's own output or traceback; odoo_errors reads ir.logging; failures become a persisted FAILED verdict instead of a hopeful summary.
• 🧾 Not only modules. The same machine also runs a functional spec (mode=functional): configure a live instance and load data in human-approved batches, with Odoo's own importer for CSV/Excel, and close with a runbook a person can repeat. → The functional path
• 🔒 Credentials are not consent. The first socket of a project needs an explicit human authorization bound to url + db + user (.sdd/grants.json).
• ⏪ Rollback that tells the truth. Checkpoints snapshot files and journal every odoo_execute pre-image, and a restore always reports the files created after the checkpoint. What it cannot undo, it says so.
• 🧱 Documentation as a gate. odoo_docs produces the OCA readme/ fragments, the Apps index.html and a mandatory changelog entry — and it works on an existing module with no spec, no phase and no instance.
• 🧪 Instance-free static layers. odoo_validate (structure + ACL coherence) and odoo_security_scan (raw SQL, sudo(), auth="none", QWeb t-raw…) give findings with file:line before anything is installed.
• 📖 Manuals written like a story, checked like code. odoo_manual reads the functional canon of a model from the instance (buttons and the states that show them, required fields, notebook pages, menus, access rules, the exact raise UserError sites), plans a storyboard, lints the prose against the canon, captures annotated screenshots read-only by default, and renders a manual a person can follow — a labelled screenshot per instruction, with the recovery path when the canon says the button can raise.
• 🧑⚖️ Policy the model cannot relax. Allowlist, guards and delegation mode all require native human approval to change.
• 🤖 Supervised or autonomous. The same pipeline runs with a human answering each gate, or with a human-proxy agent and unattended goal rounds until DONE or BLOCKED.
• 📁 Specs where you want them. Keep them beside each project, or collect every project's specs in one folder you can search.
• 🖥️ Linux, macOS and Windows. Paths, atomic writes and .env permissions are handled per platform and tested on Windows in CI.

---

🚀 Quick start

1. Install into a profile

dsh plugin --profile web add dsh-odoo-sdd

That installs the published package from the npm registry — no clone, no build, nothing to compile on your side. dsh plugin is a thin pnpm forwarder: it runs pnpm add inside the profile directory and then registers the bundle (dsh.profile.bundles). Two consequences worth knowing:

• pnpm must be on your PATH (dsh plugin reports it when it is not).
• Any pnpm spec works, so you can pin a version: dsh plugin --profile web add dsh-odoo-sdd@0.17.0.

Prefer plain npm — a project that depends on the plugin, or a CI job?

npm install dsh-odoo-sdd        # 0.17.0, published with a provenance attestation

[!IMPORTANT] Restart DSH and refresh the browser tab after installing. Client-side changes (the Odoo SDD settings panel) load from the installed package.

Working on the plugin itself? Install the checkout instead. lib/ is build output and is not committed; npm install builds it through the prepare hook, and you can always ask for it explicitly:

git clone https://github.com/fhidalgodev/dsh-odoo-sdd && cd dsh-odoo-sdd
npm install          # devDependencies: typescript, then prepare builds lib/
npm run host:deps    # optional peers, needed to compile (no-save)
npm run build        # emits lib/ — required, package main is lib/index.js
dsh plugin --profile odoo add .

[!NOTE] A git install runs that prepare build on the consumer's machine, and pnpm blocks dependency build scripts until they are allowed: the command tells you the exact key to add under allowBuilds in the profile's pnpm-workspace.yaml. A registry install needs none of that — the tarball already ships lib/.

dsh plugin add records the bundle in the profile's package.json (dsh.profile.bundles), and the package ships a Cordis patch (cordis.patch.yml) that inserts its own row — so there is no manual composition step. dsh --profile <name> --dump-config prints the composed tree without booting anything.

2. Give it credentials (once per project)

Ask the agent to run odoo_setup mode=check. It writes a secret-free scaffold and you fill the password yourself:

odoo_setup mode=interactive url=http://localhost:8069 db=odoo_dev username=admin
# then fill ODOO_PASSWORD (an Odoo API key is recommended) in the printed file
odoo_setup mode=authorize   # asks YOU, once, to authorize that exact target

Or do it by hand — the plugin looks for the first of these that exists:

#	Location	Scope
1	ODOO_SDD_ENV_FILE	explicit environment override
2	<project>/.sdd/instances/<name>.env	one target per file, the active instance
3	<project>/.sdd/.env	single-target layout (also listed as the instance default)
4	~/.config/dsh-odoo-sdd/.env (honors $XDG_CONFIG_HOME)	user scope — one set of dev credentials for every project
5	<project>/.env	legacy location, still supported (reported as legacy)

Several targets in one project. A workspace that needs a local CE server, a staging EE server and a client's instance no longer overwrites its only .env: each target gets its own file under .sdd/instances/, and one is active.

odoo_setup mode=instance instance=list                      # what exists, non-secret identity
odoo_setup mode=instance instance=add name=staging url=https://stg.example.com db=stg username=ci
# fill the secret in .sdd/instances/staging.env by hand, then:
odoo_setup mode=authorize name=staging                     # grants THAT target
odoo_setup mode=instance instance=use name=staging          # activate it FOR THIS SESSION
odoo_setup mode=instance instance=remove name=staging       # needs confirm_destructive=true
odoo_setup mode=revoke name=staging                         # drops only that target's grant

The active target belongs to the SESSION, not the project. Each chat keeps its own pointer (.sdd/instances/active-<sessionId>.json), so two sessions on one project can work in two environments at once — one on staging, another on a client's server — without either moving the other.

A session that has not chosen is ASKED, never given a default. The first Odoo operation in a new chat refuses and returns the question, with the available targets and their non-secret identity:

This session has no environment chosen yet, and this project defines 2 instance(s):
  - acme: https://… db=acme user=admin
  - globex: https://… db=globex user=admin   (the project's last used)
ASK THE DEVELOPER which one THIS session should use, then record the answer:
  - an existing one: `odoo_setup mode=instance instance=use name=<name>`
  - a new one: `odoo_setup mode=instance instance=add name=<name> url=… db=… username=…`, …

Inheriting the project's last-used target is convenient exactly once and dangerous afterwards: another session switching environments would silently redirect a working one, and its tool answers would still just say OK. One question per session buys that away. .sdd/instances/active.json is kept only as the suggestion shown in the question. A project with no named instances (just .sdd/.env, the single-target layout) is never asked, and requireInstanceChoice: false restores the old inheritance for anyone who prefers it.

Authorization is per target (url+db+user), so two instances on the same server are two grants. authorize takes the target's NAME, which is what makes switching recoverable: grants expire (12 h), and requiring activation before authorization used to be a closed circle — use demands a live grant for the target, while authorize only ever saw the active one. Naming it breaks the circle: authorize staging without leaving main.

Activating a target that has no live grant is still refused — the pointer decides where mutations go, so it cannot be switched to something nobody approved. With several instances and none active, every connection tool refuses instead of picking one by order, and an old .sdd/.env keeps working untouched as default until you choose to move it yourself.

mkdir -p ~/.config/dsh-odoo-sdd && cd ~/.config/dsh-odoo-sdd
cp <plugin>/.env.example .env && chmod 600 .env
# fill: ODOO_URL, ODOO_DB, ODOO_USERNAME, and ONE secret:
#   ODOO_PASSWORD=<account password>   or   ODOO_API_KEY=<api key>

The secret has two accepted names. ODOO_PASSWORD and ODOO_API_KEY are both read, and the API key is the recommended one: Odoo accepts it wherever it accepts a password over RPC (Settings → Users → API Keys, and use a key with the global scope). If both are set, ODOO_PASSWORD wins and the plugin reports that the other was ignored, so a rotated credential cannot go unnoticed.

There is one place an API key does not work, and it is Odoo's rule, not this plugin's: odoo_session and odoo_import authenticate a web session, and Odoo authenticates interactive logins with interactive: True while only consulting the API-key table otherwise. Configure an account password if you need those two; everything else works with the key.

Which API the plugin speaks

Server	Transport	Credential
Odoo 19+	POST /json/2/<model>/<method> — named parameters, Authorization: Bearer	API key
Any version	POST /jsonrpc — execute_kw	password or API key

On 19+ the plugin uses the modern JSON-2 API: no uid round-trip, named parameters validated by Odoo itself, read-replica routing for @api.readonly methods, and errors that arrive as an HTTP status with a structured body. It falls back to classic JSON-RPC automatically in three cases: the route is missing, the server predates it, or the credential cannot be used there at all. That last one matters: JSON-2 authenticates with Authorization: Bearer only, so a target configured with an account PASSWORD answers 401 on every call — and a 401 means the request never ran, so serving it over the other transport cannot double-apply anything. A call the server actually PROCESSED and refused (403, 422, a domain error) is never re-sent. Pin the choice with odooApi: auto | json2 | jsonrpc in the panel or with odoo_config; json2 reports a missing route instead of degrading quietly.

Business actions (action_*, button_*, do_*) always use execute_kw: JSON-2 has no positional-argument form, and inventing a position→name mapping for a method whose signature the plugin does not know is exactly the kind of silent mis-send it refuses to make.

[!WARNING] Never paste a password into the chat, a spec, a commit or an issue. The plugin refuses a group/world-readable .env, redacts the secret from every tool output, and stores session cookies in .sdd/session.json (mode 600) without ever returning them to the model.

3. Ask for the thing you want

Implement a sale order approval module for Odoo 19, using the SDD workflow.

The agent picks up odoo-sdd-workflow from the session skill catalog and follows the protocol. If you want to be explicit — or you want to be sure the full instructions are loaded — start your message with /odoo-sdd-workflow.

For configuration and data work on a running instance, ask for that instead:

Set up company, taxes and chart of accounts in my dev instance, then import
this customers.csv — functional SDD, dev environment, no production.

That selects odoo-functional-sdd (or /odoo-functional-sdd explicitly) and the functional spec mode described below.

---

🧭 The five phases

Phase	What happens	Gate to leave it
CLARIFY	Intent recorded (mode create/bug, licensed, and optionally translations — see below) and the security interview answered: groups, ACLs, record rules, sudo() justification, public routes	sdd_phase clarify
READ_SPEC	spec.md is assimilated: business context, numbered acceptance criteria, constraints, target Odoo version. Writing code here is forbidden.	APPROVED + mark_spec_loaded
ARCHITECTURE	Models, views (including extra view types and a search view where they matter), reports, security matrix and test-plan.md	APPROVED
WRITE_CODE	The module is implemented with version-pinned Odoo patterns and its OCA documentation. In mode=bug the failing reproduction comes FIRST and is recorded in test-plan.md as red (evidence: …)	static gates green
VERIFY	Ascending pyramid: static → install/upgrade → RPC/data → UI (Playwright) only for critical flows	persisted PASSED verdict
FIX_LOOP	Root-cause fixes. 3 consecutive failures force a consultant diagnosis; 5 iterations force BLOCKED	honest verdict

Are the strings translated? (translations)

CLARIFY asks it, next to the licensing question, and the answer is recorded on the spec — not as a global setting, exactly like the edition. One workspace can hold a client project that ships in Spanish and an internal fix that ships no languages at all.

sdd_phase operation=clarify spec_id=<id> mode=… licensed=… translations=["es_VE","es_PA"]

• Omitting translations means the work is not translated. That is a normal answer, so unlike mode and licensed it is NOT a fail-closed gate.
• The codes are gettext (ll or ll_CC: es_VE, es_PA, pt_BR, fr). A malformed one is refused while it can still be corrected, instead of becoming a file the server would never load.
• Declaring languages makes odoo_i18n part of the plan and puts the matching acceptance criterion in test-plan.md: "i18n/<lang>.po exists and no exported term is left with an empty msgstr" — which odoo_i18n operation=check verifies.
• sdd_phase status reports them, so "did we translate this?" is answerable without opening state.json.

In ARCHITECTURE the agent also asks about the things that are cheap to decide early and expensive to discover late: extra view types beyond form/tree (including a search view for how a model is searched — custom filters, favorites), reports (PDF via ir.actions.report/QWeb, SQL, CSV/XLSX, an external tool), web tours (onboarding, test, or none — with the asset bundle that loads them, because a tour no bundle loads never runs) and demo data (which files, and what for). Each one is answered explicitly — "form + tree only", "no reports needed", "no tours needed", "no demo data". Those are guide decisions: recorded in ## Views / ## Reports / ## Tours / ## Demo data and surfaced as warnings in sdd_phase status, non-blocking by design — the security model is the only fail-closed content gate. The version-by-version tour API, the HttpCase that executes a tour and the demo traps live in resources/references/tours-and-demo.md; the test cycle, the case classes per version and what makes a test trustworthy live in resources/references/odoo-tests.md.

Per-spec artifacts (all on disk, resumable):

specs/<NNN>-<slug>/
├── spec.md · architecture.md · test-plan.md
├── verify-verdict.txt   # honest persisted verdict
├── state.json           # phase, failures, iterations
├── kb.json              # decisions, discarded options, blockers, diagnoses
├── docs-report.md · security-report.md
└── handoff.md           # written by sdd_handoff when the run closes

---

🧩 The functional path (configure and import)

Not every Odoo job is code. Setting up a company, its taxes, its users and its master data is configuration and data, and it happens on a live instance — where a wrong click is not a failed test but a real record. The same SDD machine covers it with a different middle phase and stricter closing rules.

graph TD
    C1["1 CLARIFY<br/>objective, instance, ENVIRONMENT"] --> R2["2 READ_SPEC<br/>spec.md, criteria, sources"]
    R2 -->|APPROVED| A3["3 ARCHITECTURE<br/>to-be process, batches, risks"]
    A3 -->|APPROVED| X4["4 APPLY_CONFIG<br/>discovery + approved batches"]
    X4 --> V5["5 VERIFY<br/>re-read the records, evidence per AC"]
    V5 -->|PASSED| D9(["runbook.md + handoff.md - DONE"])
    V5 -->|FAILED| F6["FIX_LOOP"]
    F6 --> X4

    style X4 fill:#1e1e2e,stroke:#f9e2af,stroke-width:2px,color:#cdd6f4

	Development run	Functional run
Chosen at CLARIFY	mode=create or mode=bug	mode=functional
Middle phase	WRITE_CODE (module source)	APPLY_CONFIG (batches against the instance)
Deliverable	module + OCA docs	configured instance + functional-runbook.md
Skill	odoo-sdd-workflow	odoo-functional-sdd

How a change reaches the instance. Nothing is written "to see what happens":

1. Discovery first, under its OWN approval: which models, which fields, how many records. Reads are not mutations, but an approved scope is what stops "just looking around" from turning into a change.
2. Plan: the design becomes batches. Each one declares its destination and environment, the version and capabilities used, company and context, the acceptance criteria it covers, its ordered operations, record identity, preconditions, expected result, risks, recovery and manual steps.
3. Approve: the human sees the exact batch and approves it through the native approval seam. The receipt is bound to the hashes of the spec, the design, the plan and the batch — change any of them and the approval is void.
4. Apply: one operation at a time, re-checking those hashes, persisting each operation's state before the call and after the result.
5. An unknown outcome is not a retry. A timeout after a mutation may mean Odoo already committed, so the operation is marked indeterminate, the batch stops and the run parks until a human reconciles it.
6. Close honestly: sdd_phase succeed demands an explicit pass per acceptance criterion, the security review is mandatory, and so is the runbook (who does it, in which company, prerequisites, the verified menu path, the steps with their field labels, the expected result, how to check it and how to undo it) — whatever the documentation policy says.

The environment is declared, never assumed. ODOO_SDD_ENVIRONMENT on the target says dev, staging or production. A plan that declares a different environment than the target is refused (environment-mismatch), an undeclared target asks for it (NEEDS_ENVIRONMENT), and production additionally needs a declared backup reference plus its own approval. High-risk changes are proven in staging first.

Imports go through Odoo's importer, never through a hand-written parser:

odoo_import use=prepare file=... model=res.partner   # uploads, with its own approval
odoo_import use=preview   ...                        # what ODOO read: sheets, headers, sample
odoo_import use=map       ...                        # one decision per column, no blanks
odoo_import use=plan      ...                        # becomes an `apply` batch
odoo_functional operation=approve / apply            # the batch path, unchanged

The version contract is explicit (majors 10–19: file/import_id + JSONP on the old endpoint, ufile/id + JSON on the new one, do/execute_import for the apply), and a version outside the verified families is refused with what to investigate instead of guessed. A file that changed after the upload invalidates the mapping; a nextrow in the answer means the importer stopped mid-file and is reported as partial, never as success — and the rows it counted are never re-sent. The session cookie stays in .sdd/session.json (mode 600) and out of every tool result.

[!NOTE] The functional path needs an instance, and the importer needs a web session: run odoo_session once before odoo_import use=prepare.

---

🧰 The 18 tools

Tool	Purpose
odoo_connect	Probe the instance: server version + authentication. Masked report; distinguishes NEEDS_SETUP / NEEDS_SECRET / DEFERRED / SKIPPED states (never asks for secrets in chat).
odoo_setup	Onboarding: check (cascade + gitignore + delegation mode), interactive (secret-free chmod-600 scaffold), authorize (ask the DEVELOPER, through native approval, for a connection grant bound to the current url/db/user), revoke (drop the grants), purge (plan first, then — with confirm_destructive=true plus human approval — remove only the plugin's own state under .sdd/), later, skip, reset, autonomy (supervised | autonomous, human-approved). Secrets are never accepted as parameters.
odoo_module	info / install / upgrade on ir.module.module (button_immediate_*). Returns the server's own output or traceback, redacted — the closed feedback loop.
odoo_execute	Generic RPC (execute_kw) against the instance: any public method of any model is callable, and what it needs is decided by what it is. READS (search, search_read, search_count, read, read_group, fields_get, name_get, name_search, default_get, exists, check_access_rights, check_access_rule) run freely, with fields/limit/order/offset for projection and paging (a fractional or negative offset is refused, never clamped); CRUD mutations (create/write/unlink) require confirm_destructive=true AND the model in executeAllowlist, and are journaled so the data undo can replay them; every business action (action_*, button_*, do_*…, e.g. confirming an order) runs with confirm_destructive=true and no allowlist, because the plugin cannot replay its effect — it is never journaled, no undo exists for it, and a timeout is reported as an INDETERMINATE outcome instead of a plain failure — the same rule now applies to CRUD, because a create whose answer never arrived may already have committed and reporting it as a retryable failure is how one effect becomes two. Declare precondition/postcondition (the same shape a batch uses: {domain, expect, count}) to carry a state guard before the call and a state proof after it: if the precondition fails, nothing is sent; if the postcondition fails, the answer says the call WAS sent and the instance may be half-changed, and the CRUD mutation keeps its journal receipt (created id + pre-image) so it can still be compensated; without one, OK only means the server accepted the call. A private method (_name) is refused, and that wall is Odoo's own: execute_kw dispatches through get_public_method, which answers AccessError for _…, init, @api.private and the internal attribute names — so read the model in the source (the native/custom repositories are reported by odoo_config mode=read) and call the public button or action that wraps it (sale.order._create_invoices is private; the sale.advance.payment.inv wizard exposes the public create_invoices()). For several operations, or when a human approval per run is wanted, use a functional batch with kind: "method". context is forwarded verbatim — use allowed_company_ids/company_id on multi-company instances — and the server still applies its own ACL. A large answer is BOUNDED and the cut is MARKED: the text says how many characters were dropped, that what you see is the beginning (not a complete JSON document) and how to page with fields/limit/offset — and for a mutation it explicitly forbids repeating the call to get more text.
odoo_validate	LOCAL, instance-free module structure check: __manifest__.py present + depends, declared data XML files exist, security/ir.model.access.csv when models are declared. Returns file:line findings plus the module_dir and project root it resolved (a relative path resolves against the session's folder, never the process cwd).
odoo_errors	Reads recent ir.logging server errors — the remote equivalent of fetching environment logs.
odoo_session	Mints a passwordless web session (the connect_as_user pattern) stored in .sdd/session.json (chmod 600) for Playwright UI tests. The cookie itself is never returned.
sdd_phase	The phase state machine: init, status (logbook summary, spec directory and specs location), mark_spec_loaded, advance (fail-closed gates: the host is asked for approval natively and the approval_marker/approval_source stay as the documented backstop for hosts with no approval seam), fail (failure ladder + FAILED verdict), succeed (PASSED verdict; refused outside VERIFY/FIX_LOOP, and unless every AC the SPEC declares has a row in test-plan.md reading an explicit pass — an omitted criterion is not a passing one, and the verdict records the fingerprint of the evidence it used so DONE refuses a verdict made stale by an edit), rollback (restore a checkpoint OF THIS SPEC and return to the phase that mode works in — WRITE_CODE, or APPLY_CONFIG for a functional spec), diagnose, waive (record — with native approval — that THIS session may work without a spec: the developer's "leave it to your judgement", kept verbatim in .sdd/waiver.json, reported by status and by the handoff; revoke: true drops it and needs no approval).
sdd_checkpoint	The rollback surface: create (snapshots the workspace, becomes the active checkpoint), list, restore (files, plus — with restore_data=true and confirm_destructive=true — the journaled data mutations: the undo runs under the company context the mutation used, turns read shapes into write values, marks each op so a retry never compensates it twice, refuses a journal from another destination, and reports every field it could not restore; it always REPORTS files created after the checkpoint and deletes them only with remove_created=true), drop, journal.
odoo_docs	Documentation for a module, usable on its own (no spec, phase, checkpoint or instance), so an existing module can simply be documented: check (OCA fragments mapped to Diátaxis, version scheme, changelog, index.html, docstrings, xpath comments, OWL directives → ERROR/WARN with file:line), plan, scaffold (create-only skeletons, never overwrites) and report (persists docs-report.md; APPROVED only when nothing is still a scaffold). The changelog entry is mandatory for any change to a released module.
odoo_security_scan	Local static security review (no instance needed): raw SQL by concatenation, eval/exec/pickle, hardcoded secrets, unjustified sudo(), auth="none", disabled CSRF, QWeb t-raw. Findings carry file:line + a fix hint; any ERROR blocks DONE.
odoo_manual	Narrated user manuals built on evidence. canon reads the functional canon of a model from the instance (views, header buttons and the states that reveal them, required fields, notebook pages, actions, menus, access rules, groups, raise UserError/ValidationError and _sql_constraints sites) and persists it with a fingerprint: the manual may only describe what the canon says. plan turns the canon into a storyboard (flows, ordered steps, one sentence per step): re-running it MERGES, so the narration, captures and prose already written survive. lint checks the storyboard and the rendered prose against the canon (CANON-STALE, TARGET-UNKNOWN, PLACEHOLDER-UNBOUND, ACTS-MISSING, RECOVERY-MISSING, AI-tell patterns in Spanish and English → ERROR/WARN with the exact line). explore returns the ARIA snapshot of a real screen so no xml id or label is guessed. capture drives a browser: read-only steps always run, and action steps (new/fill/select/press/click) require allow_actions=true — which the guard treats as a mutation. render writes the manual and an Apps page (create-only unless overwrite=true). import turns a Playwright codegen recording into a flow and refuses any recording that carries credentials. Manuals live where Settings says (manualsMode: specs next to the spec, docs under manualsDir, module as OCA fragments under the module's readme/manual/); standalone work without a spec never blocks on one. canon takes the interview — as_user (who the manual is for), admin, module/modules and groups — and records it: the inventory then covers EVERY menu and EVERY action the module owns (the action a menu opens, even a native one), and every model arrives with its fields (label, type, required, relation/selection, groups), its form and list buttons, its statusbar states and its per-group access rows. plan opens one flow per menu and one per access-group walk, and seeds a docs checklist with one empty cell per field and per button. lint reports MODULE-COVERAGE, INTERVIEW-MISSING, FIELD-COVERAGE, BUTTON-COVERAGE, WORKFLOW-COVERAGE and GROUP-COVERAGE while a menu, an action, a field, a button, the workflow or a group is still uncovered — a skip with a reason is documented coverage, and ROLE-UNVERIFIED warns because a capture runs as the connected user. render adds a table per model (type, required, relation, groups, and your sentence) and a section per access group. odoo_docs adds a ## User manual section to the documentation verdict as soon as a storyboard exists — and stays untouched when there is none.
odoo_tests	The testing half of the pipeline, usable on its own (no spec, phase, checkpoint or instance): check scans the Python tests for what an install log cannot show — a tests/*.py that tests/__init__.py never imports (Odoo only loads what is imported, so the test never runs), a class that is not an Odoo test case, a test_* that asserts nothing or asserts something trivially true, a swallowed exception, time.sleep, explicit skips, cr.commit() inside a test (it breaks the per-test rollback), SavepointCase on 17+, an HttpCase without start_tour — with assertion density as an informational metric. plan maps every acceptance criterion of the spec to the test that mentions it (by AC id or by the REQ-<AREA>-NN id of its requirement) and lists the criteria with no test. scaffold writes one RED stub per uncovered criterion (body raises NotImplementedError, never a vacuous pass), create-only and idempotent, adding the import so the file actually loads.
sdd_handoff	Writes specs/<id>/handoff.md (final phase, verdict, decisions, blockers, checkpoints, the COMPLETE per-spec data journal, effective config, next steps) when the run closes.
odoo_config	Reads or updates the persistent configuration and answers "which project am I in?": the resolved root, its provenance (session cwd / configured / process cwd), the specs base, the effective spec directory and the config file in use.
odoo_i18n	Translations through Odoo's own models: base.language.export supplies the translatable terms and base.language.install activates the language. export writes <module>/i18n/<lang>.po (creating the i18n/ folder when missing) and MERGES with the file already there — a written translation is never replaced by what the export says, new terms are added, and terms the module dropped are kept as #~ instead of deleted. status reports what each language covers, check fails while an entry still awaits its text. It does not translate: the export gives the message IDs and a person writes the text. Version-aware (Odoo 16 is the boundary, the same one that removed ir.translation).
odoo_import	Preparation of a CSV/XLS/XLSX import through Odoo's OWN importer (base_import), never through a parser of this plugin: prepare uploads the authorised file with the web session and its own approval, preview reports what Odoo reads (sheets, headers, a bounded sample, the importable fields), map records a decision per column, plan turns it into an apply batch — and odoo_functional approves and executes it like any other, so this tool never applies an import on its own. A JSONP answer is parsed as data (never executed), the session cookie never leaves the plugin, and a version outside the verified families is refused with what to investigate.
odoo_functional	The batch executor of the functional path: plan (validate and store a batch fail-closed), approve (native human approval bound to the spec, design, plan and batch hashes), apply (execute it one operation at a time, persisting each state before and after the call, and record it as applied only after reading back the state the operation declared — a call that answers but leaves the records untouched is a failure, not a success), inspect (read-only discovery under its own scope), status, reconcile (decide an outcome that came back as unknown), verify (evidence per acceptance criterion) and compensate (build the undo batch from the journal). The declared environment gates the run and production additionally needs a declared backup; while a batch runs, every other mutation path is denied.

---

🎛️ Delegation mode

The pipeline starts by asking how much of it to delegate — recorded once per project with odoo_setup mode=autonomy decision=...:

Mode	Who answers the gates	How it ends
Supervised (default)	you, for each gated phase	you approve, or the run parks
Autonomous	a human-proxy agent (resources/roles/human-proxy.md) that emits only a fail-closed line-start APPROVED or NEEDS_REVISION	create_goal runs unattended rounds until DONE or BLOCKED

[!TIP] In autonomous mode the brakes stay armed: stop.md, the iteration ceiling and the diagnosis ladder all remain, and BLOCKED is the only way the run pages a human. Connection grants are not covered by the switch — a human still authorizes the instance once.

---

🧠 Context engineering layers

Layer	Component
identity	resources/roles/*.md — architect, developer, qa, consultant, human-proxy, security-reviewer, documentation roles, each with its limits. Both bundled skills declare resources/ as their resourceBase, so every roles/… and references/… path resolves from the base the host hands the model
odoo_connection	odoo-client.ts — JSON-RPC auth, execute_kw, session minting
executors	odoo_module, odoo_execute, odoo_validate, odoo_errors
schemas	staged templates with required sections; transition() rejects a phase whose deliverable lacks them
knowledge	version-pinned Odoo pattern skills (delegated, verified by the skill)
skills	skills/*/SKILL.md — the 5-phase development flow and the functional flow, auto-registered with the host on apply(). The body is the ROUTE (phases, owners, gates, exits); the per-phase WORK lives in resources/roles/ and resources/references/, loaded on demand. Measured budgets keep the selected load from creeping back
logbook	kb.json — decisions, discarded options, blockers; read before proposing
audit	.sdd/audit.jsonl — sanitized append-only tool-activity log, written by a global tools/result listener (not just the Odoo tools)
rollback	.sdd/checkpoints/<id>/ — manifest + file snapshot + data journal, restorable per spec
security	odoo_security_scan rules + the security-reviewer role + the mandatory security interview in CLARIFY
test	tests/smoke.mjs — instance-free invariant suite (state machine, security, policy guard, RPC shapes, root/specs layout, real-Cordis host contract) + tests/client.mjs — browser bundle contract and settings-panel render

---

🛡️ Safety, rollback and traceability

The pipeline assumes the agent will eventually be wrong, so every mutation path has a way back and a way to prove what happened.

• Credentials are not consent. Before any tool opens a socket towards the instance, a HUMAN must have approved that exact target. odoo_setup mode=authorize asks through the host's native approval seam and only the allowed-once outcome stores a receipt in .sdd/grants.json (0600, gitignored). The receipt is bound to a fingerprint of url + db + username, so changing any of them invalidates it; mode=revoke drops it. Without a live receipt, no client is handed out at all, so a configured .env cannot be used silently. In AUTONOMOUS mode there are no answerers, so the run reports NOT AUTHORIZED and parks — which is the point.

• The model cannot relax its own policy. Changing the allowlist or the policy guards (odoo_config mode=set) and switching delegation mode (odoo_setup mode=autonomy) each require a native approval.

• No change without a spec — or your explicit waiver. Whatever the request ("now also change X" in the same chat), a change needs a spec in a writing phase (WRITE_CODE, VERIFY, FIX_LOOP, APPLY_CONFIG) or a waiver you approved for THAT session. The gate covers both surfaces: instance mutations (odoo_execute, odoo_module, odoo_import prepare) and source edits through the host's write/edit tools. Writing the spec documents themselves (specs/, .sdd/) is never blocked — otherwise the way out would be blocked too. A small change is a small spec: mode=bug, one acceptance criterion, no design interview. If you would rather not specify it, sdd_phase operation=waive detail="..." records your words, needs your approval, and covers this session only: the next chat starts under the policy again, and every change made under it still lands in the KB as a decision. requireSpecForChanges: false is the human off-switch. Honest hole: the guard sees host tool calls, so a change made through bash (a heredoc, sed -i) is not gated — the pipeline is the path, not a jail.

  Where the question is asked (specPolicyScope, default "odoo"). A spec requirement is only meaningful where there is Odoo work, and the gate used to check one thing only: whether the path fell inside the session's root. So a plugin installed at profile level blocked writes in folders that have nothing to do with Odoo — notes, a pipeline of your own, anything. With "odoo", a file edit is gated only where the directory shows a sign of Odoo work:

  • .sdd/ holding real plugin state (config, specs, checkpoints, a waiver) — not a .sdd/ containing only audit.jsonl, which the audit listener writes for every tool call and which therefore means "something ran here", not "this is an Odoo project";
  • __manifest__.py in the root — the directory IS a module;
  • __manifest__.py one level down — the directory holds modules;
  • an odoo_* tool already used against that root in this session.

  An instance mutation is always gated: it is an odoo_* call, which is itself the evidence. stop.md still halts everything, adopted or not, because it is an emergency stop and not a scope question. "everywhere" restores the old blanket behaviour, and the refusal now names the signal that armed it rather than leaving you to guess.

  Three ways out, and all three work. (1) a small spec for this change, (2) continue the spec that already covers it, (3) ask the developer to waive — sdd_phase operation=waive detail="...". The third used to require a spec_id, which made it unreachable in the one situation it exists for: a directory with no specs, where you would have to create one to say you did not want one. A waiver is per project and per session, and spec_id is now optional for it (and for waive revoke=true) while every other operation still demands it.

• Checkpoint before mutating. With requireCheckpointBeforeMutation on (default), instance mutations are denied until sdd_checkpoint create has snapshotted the active spec — and denied outright before WRITE_CODE. The rule covers odoo_execute (CRUD and business actions), odoo_module install|upgrade, odoo_import use=prepare and odoo_functional operation=apply, which used to be missing from that classification. Snapshots skip symlinks (lstat) and never copy .env or key material.

• Fail-closed guard. An internal guard failure denies with a visible reason instead of allowing the call through. The guard is also a MOUNT requirement while either policy is armed: a host that exposes no tools.guard (or whose guard cannot be installed) makes the plugin refuse to mount with the reason and the way out, instead of staying up and looking protected.

• The canonical phase decides. Authorization reads the phase from specs/<id>/state.json; the pointer only says WHICH spec and checkpoint the session works on. A stale pointer can no longer authorize a change for a spec that has already gone BLOCKED.

• The pointer belongs to the session. It lives in .sdd/active/<sessionId>.json, so two chats open on one project no longer overwrite each other and neither can authorize its changes against the other's spec — the failure this scoping exists for. .sdd/active.json remains only as the project's last spec: a new session adopts it as a hint when it is fresh (< 12 h) and names a spec that still exists, and otherwise starts with no spec at all. Checkpoint snapshots stay shared (they are the project's), while which checkpoint is your rollback target is per session; dropping one clears the reference in every pointer that held it. Set adoptProjectPointerHint: false to remove the hint entirely: every session then starts with no spec until it declares one (sdd_phase status spec_id=…), which is the strictest reading of "one session, one spec".

• File rollback. sdd_checkpoint restore puts the snapshotted files back byte-for-byte; sdd_phase rollback returns the spec to the phase its MODE works in — WRITE_CODE, or APPLY_CONFIG for a functional spec — with the failure recorded, so the loop restarts from a known state. It refuses a checkpoint that belongs to another spec. A checkpoint snapshots the project tree, so with the central specs layout the spec documents (which live outside the project) are deliberately not part of it: the spec is the immutable source of truth, not code to roll back.

• Data rollback (best effort, and honest about it). Every create/write/unlink through odoo_execute records its pre-image in the checkpoint journal, stamped with the database and the destination (url+db+user) it was applied to; restore restore_data=true confirm_destructive=true replays it in reverse and refuses a journal from another destination. The replay runs under the company context the mutation used, converts read shapes into write values (many2one, x2many), marks each operation as it is compensated so a retry never repeats one, and reports the fields it could not restore (binary content, read-only or non-stored fields). Re-created records get NEW ids — the report says so. This covers data written through the plugin — not side effects of a module install/upgrade, which are not reverted at database level.

• Restore reports drift. restore always lists the files created after the checkpoint, so nothing is silently left behind; remove_created=true deletes them (inside the snapshotted roots only) to match the snapshot exactly.

• Documentation is a gate, not a footnote. ARCHITECTURE records the decision in ## Documentation, WRITE_CODE produces the OCA fragments + the Apps index.html + the mandatory changelog entry, and DONE is gated by documentationPolicy (required by default; optional and off available). What the plugin cannot do, it says so: gen-odoo-readme, towncrier, Ruff and pylint need a shell, so the fragments are the source of truth and compiling README.rst stays your step.

• Lifecycle: the plugin owns its state and can give it back. odoo_setup mode=purge prints a plan (what it owns and what it deliberately keeps) and deletes only after confirm_destructive=true plus native human approval. It never touches .env (your credentials), stop.md (your brake) or specs/ (your documents).

• Durable state. Pipeline state, KB, verdicts, grants and the journal are written with an atomic replace, and a corrupt file is quarantined next to the original instead of being overwritten: sdd_phase status reports the recovery.

• Traceability. .sdd/audit.jsonl records every tool call with outcome (ok / error / denied), duration and phase; sdd_phase status prints the logbook; sdd_handoff freezes the whole run into handoff.md.

• Emergency brakes. stop.md (at .sdd/stop.md or specs/<active>/stop.md) halts every tool; iteration ceilings and the diagnosis ladder route to BLOCKED instead of looping forever.

---

🔐 Security & network posture

• No phone-home. The plugin's ONLY outbound network calls go to the instance URL you put in .env. No telemetry, no update checks, no third-party endpoints.
• Transport guard (fail-closed). http:// is accepted only for loopback hosts (localhost, 127.x, ::1, *.localhost); anything else must be https://, otherwise credential loading is refused — plain http to a remote host would ship the API key in clear text.
• Secret containment. The secret is read once by credentials.ts and only injected into RPC parameters. Every tool output passes through two-layer redaction (known secret + generic password= / Bearer / api_key= / session_id shapes) and home-path masking (/home/user/… → ~/…) before being shown to the model or persisted to the KB.
• Session cookies never reach the model. odoo_session writes the cookie to .sdd/session.json (chmod 600) and returns only the path. The capture motor does not even write one: it authenticates the web session in memory and keeps the cookie there for the browser context.
• The capture browser is locked to the instance origin. Every request that leaves the instance's base URL is aborted, so a page that tries to reach a third-party host fails instead of loading. Capture is read-only by default: steps that only observe (goto, menu, wait, assert, explore, screenshot, confirm) always run; steps that act (new, fill, select, press, click) require allow_actions=true AND confirm_destructive=true, the guard classifies that call as a mutation (spec in a writing phase or a waiver) — and a click has no compensating entry: unlike a CRUD call, the plugin cannot undo what the UI did. Capture against a disposable database.
• A recording is read as data, and credentials are refused. odoo_manual operation=import parses the codegen text; a recording carrying a password field, an Authorization header or a cookie is rejected by line, and the value is never echoed back.
• A credential file is not written while git can still see it (fail-closed). Before scaffolding a .env, the plugin asks git itself — git check-ignore for the ignore rules and git ls-files for the index — and refuses with status: needs-gitignore when a protected path is missing from .gitignore or is already tracked, in which case the only fix it names is git rm --cached. An ignore rule never protects a file that is in the index, and that gap is exactly how a .sdd/.env with a live password reached a remote branch once. Where git is absent, the fallback reads the .gitignore text and says so instead of claiming proof. Opt out per project with requireGitignoreBeforeCredentials: false.
• No install scripts beyond the build. The only lifecycle scripts are prepare/prepack, which compile src/ into the shipped lib/ and do nothing else — no network, no postinstall, no shell. The two have opposite failure policies on purpose: prepare (which runs on an install) never fails one — without the devDependencies or the optional host peers it says what it could not check and emits without type checking so the plugin still loads — while prepack (which runs on a publish) refuses to package a build it could not typecheck. prepack is also what guarantees a published tarball is never missing the entry point its main promises (that failure was real: a clean clone packed 39 files and zero of them under lib/; so was its sequel, a prepare that typechecked during npm install and failed every CI job before the step that installs those peers could run).
• Host requirement declared twice, following dsh-market discovery conventions: engines.dsh and lockstep optional peer ranges on @deepseek-ai/{cordis,dsh-tools,schemastery}. On a host without the tools service the plugin refuses to mount with an explicit error instead of booting broken.

---

🖥️ Platform support

The plugin runs wherever DSH does and claims Linux, macOS and Windows — a claim the CI matrix tests rather than asserts (ubuntu-latest and windows-latest, on Node 20 and 22).

Concern	Behaviour
Paths	module_dir and an explicit root accept POSIX (/opt/odoo) and Windows (C:\odoo, UNC) spellings; an absolute path is never concatenated under the project root.
.env permissions	Owner-only (0600) is requested and re-checked after chmod: on a filesystem that cannot express mode bits (Windows, FAT/exFAT, some mounts) the plugin says "owner-only mode requested" and adds a note instead of pretending the file is private. On a real POSIX filesystem, a loose mode that cannot be tightened is still refused.
Atomic writes	State files are written to a sibling temp file and renamed into place, retrying EPERM/EACCES/EBUSY with a bounded backoff — the case where Windows refuses the rename because an editor, indexer or antivirus holds an open handle.
Project root	Resolved per call from the session's folder; the process cwd is only a last resort and is reported as LAST RESORT.
Symlinks	A checkpoint never follows a symlink out of the tree; the test suite skips its symlink assertions where the OS or the user privileges forbid creating one — and says so instead of passing silently.

📁 Where specs live

The project root is the folder open in the current session, so it is not a plugin-wide setting. Spec documents follow it:

Layout	Path	Pick it when
project (default)	<projectRoot>/<specsDir>/<specId>	specs should travel with the code
central	<specsRoot>/<projectSlug>/<specId>	you keep many module repos and want one searchable place

In the central layout each project gets its own subfolder with a .dsh-project-root marker, plus a hash suffix if two projects share a directory name — a foreign folder is never adopted. .sdd/ always stays with the project.

<projectRoot>/
├── .sdd/                       # plugin-owned, gitignored
│   ├── .env                    # credentials, single-target layout (chmod 600)
│   ├── instances/<name>.env    # one file per Odoo target (chmod 600)
│   ├── instances/active.json   # which target is in use
│   ├── config.json             # project configuration
│   ├── grants.json             # human authorization receipts
│   ├── session.json            # Playwright cookie
│   ├── audit.jsonl             # every tool call, sanitized
│   ├── setup-state.json        # onboarding + delegation decision
│   ├── active/<sessionId>.json  # THIS session's pointer (spec, phase, checkpoint)
│   ├── active.json             # the project's last spec (a hint for new sessions)
│   └── checkpoints/<id>/       # manifest + file snapshot + data journal
└── specs/<NNN>-<slug>/         # or the central folder

[!TIP] With several projects open, read the Project root: … [provenance] line that every tool result carries, or ask odoo_config mode=read — it returns the resolved root, its provenance and the effective spec directory.

---

⚙️ Configuration

Open Settings → Odoo SDD in the Web UI. Everything is editable there, plus a few copy-paste presets where you need them.

Host requirement: the Settings panel needs dsh >= 0.2.0-rc.1. That host removed the settingsScope service this panel used to bind to, and it now renders the form from the plugin's own Config schema (entry odoo-sdd). On an older host the section is absent and the plugin says so in the console; the tools and the pipeline keep working, and odoo_config mode=read|set edits the same values from the conversation.

# ~/.dsh/profiles/<profile>/cordis.patch.yml (optional: same fields, as a patch)
- insert:
    - id: odoo-sdd
      config:
        specsMode: project      # project | central
        specsRoot: ''           # absolute folder when specsMode=central
        specsDir: specs         # folder inside the project when specsMode=project
        executeAllowlist: []    # models odoo_execute may create/write/unlink
        methodAllowlist: []     # "model.method" pairs a functional batch may call (any model)
                                # the ad-hoc RPC needs no list: any public method + confirm_destructive
        communityRepoUrl: https://github.com/odoo/odoo
        enterpriseRepoUrl: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise
        communityRepoPath: ''   # local OS path; when set it OVERRIDES communityRepoUrl
        enterpriseRepoPath: ''  # same for enterprise
        odooApi: auto           # auto | json2 | jsonrpc (auto falls back on a 401)
        autonomy: supervised    # supervised | autonomous
        licensed: community     # community | enterprise (OCA is always searched)
        requireCheckpointBeforeMutation: true
        requireGitignoreBeforeCredentials: true   # refuse a .env while git would still see it
        requireSpecForChanges: true     # every change needs a spec in a writing phase (or a waiver)
        specPolicyScope: odoo           # odoo (only where Odoo work is detected) | everywhere
        securityReviewRequired: true
        securityInterviewRequired: true
        auditAllTools: true
        maxCheckpoints: 5
        documentationPolicy: required   # required | optional | off
        documentationLanguage: ''       # empty = English unless the project says otherwise
        manualsMode: specs              # specs (next to the spec) | docs (under manualsDir) | module (readme/manual/)
        manualsDir: docs/manuals        # used only when manualsMode is docs

[!IMPORTANT] There are two configuration stores, and the more specific one wins: Settings (user-wide, ~/.dsh/settings.yaml) and the project's .sdd/config.json (written by odoo_config mode=set, per project). If a key looks ignored after you change it in the panel, the project file is pinning it — odoo_config mode=read reports the effective values.

---

🤖 Model experience

The agent sees 18 tools with self-contained descriptions. Typical flow: sdd_phase init → security interview + odoo_connect → gated phases with APPROVED → sdd_checkpoint create → code → odoo_security_scan → odoo_module install → on traceback, odoo_errors + sdd_phase fail (which may force a diagnosis) → fix (or sdd_phase rollback) → re-verify → sdd_phase succeed → sdd_handoff → DONE. Tool responses are actionable text: server tracebacks, gate rejection reasons and remediation instructions.

The workflow skill is registered at mount time, so its name and description appear in every session's skill catalog automatically. The full instructions load when the model selects it (the catalog is summaries only) or when you type /odoo-sdd-workflow.

---

⚠️ Known limitations and deferred work

• Remote tests — without shell access to the instance there is no way to run --test-enable; the second verification layer is RPC/UI testing. Pending: an optional odoo_run_tests tool if you expose a test runner.
• Data rollback is best effort — the tests write to the connected database and there is no ephemeral cloning (by design: you provision and own the target). sdd_checkpoint reverses data written through odoo_execute, but a module install/upgrade is not reverted at database level. Use a disposable database.
• Static security scan scope — odoo_security_scan is rule-based over source text (no AST, no taint tracking), so it catches the common Odoo mistakes, not everything; it complements a human review, never replaces it.
• The change policy covers tool calls, not the shell — write/edit and the Odoo tools are gated; a file written through bash (heredoc, sed -i) is not, because the host exposes no after-the-fact inspection of what a shell command wrote. The policy makes the pipeline the path of least resistance and the exception visible; it is not a sandbox.
• Multi-instance — one target per project (.env). Pending: named instance profiles (dev, staging).
• Panel fields that are informational — autonomy and securityInterviewRequired are stored and reported, but the pipeline reads the delegation decision from .sdd/setup-state.json (set with odoo_setup mode=autonomy) and enforces the security interview through the ARCHITECTURE content gate. Tracked as pending work.
• Manual capture needs a browser and a password — playwright-core is an optional dependency and the browser itself is not shipped: without Chromium, Chrome or Edge the capture answers NEEDS_BROWSER with the install line. A web session also needs the account password (Odoo refuses an API key on interactive logins), so an API-key-only project can still write and lint a manual but cannot drive the screenshots automatically.
• The manual covers one model at a time — the canon is read per model, so a cross-model walkthrough is several flows planned against several canons, and the storyboard keeps the fingerprint of the canon it was planned with (CANON-STALE warns when the instance moved).
• UI families 15, 16, 18 and 19 are declared, not proven — the capture selectors are verified end-to-end on 17; the other families share the same structure but must be checked against a dev instance before you rely on them, and familyFor refuses a major it does not know instead of guessing.
• Prose lint is advisory — the AI-tell rules are heuristics and every one of them is a WARN by design in v1: only the structural rules (one sentence per captured step, no heading inside a procedure) and the canon rules can block.
• No rich UI renderer — tool output is text in the DSH web GUI.

---

❓ Troubleshooting

Symptom	What it means	What to do
NOT CONFIGURED	no usable .env in the cascade	odoo_setup mode=interactive
NEEDS_SECRET	the scaffold exists but ODOO_PASSWORD is empty	fill it in the file, never in chat
NOT AUTHORIZED	credentials exist, no live human grant for this target	odoo_setup mode=authorize
Instance unreachable	version probe failed	check the URL/port and that the instance is running
Mutations always denied	no checkpoint, or the spec is not in WRITE_CODE yet	approve the gates, then sdd_checkpoint create
Everything is halted	stop.md exists	read it, then remove it
A panel change seems ignored	the project's .sdd/config.json outranks the global Settings layer	odoo_config mode=read shows the effective values
A spec directory "cannot be found"	you are in a different project folder	open that project's folder in a session
NEEDS_BROWSER from odoo_manual capture	no Chromium/Chrome/Edge was found	npx playwright-core install chromium, or pass browser: "chrome"
NEEDS_WEB_SESSION from odoo_manual capture	the target only has an API key, and Odoo refuses one on interactive logins	put an account password in .env, or create .sdd/session.json with odoo_session
The captured screen is in the wrong language	the browser follows the login user's language, and the plugin never writes to res.users	capture with a user whose language matches the manual
allow_actions=true is refused	the guard classifies it as a mutation	move the spec into a writing phase, or record a waiver — and use a disposable database
A capture stops midway	the first failing step aborts the run and writes what it got	fix the storyboard, then re-run with from_step: "<the failing step id>"
odoo_docs says NEEDS_CONTENT with no fragment missing	a manual ERROR (a screenshot without its image, a stale canon) or a scaffold left in place	read the ## User manual section of the report

---

🧩 Implementation internals

Plugin shape, source map and security decisions — click to expand

Plugin shape

Follows the DSH tool-plugin convention (dsh-tool-todo, dsh-tool-goal): named exports name, inject, Config (schemastery schema) and apply(ctx, config), registering each tool with defineTool from @deepseek-ai/dsh-tools. The browser half is a plain JS ModuleLoader bundle that contributes the Odoo SDD settings section.

Source map

File	Role
src/index.ts	Plugin entry: registration of the 18 tools, config resolution and the policy guard
src/types.ts	Public payload types (never contain secret material)
src/credentials.ts	Credential cascade, .env load/validation, permission verification, redact(), fail-closed
src/odoo-client.ts	JSON-RPC client: common.version, authenticate, execute_kw, button_immediate_*, ir.logging, /web/session/authenticate
src/test-scan.ts	Static rules for the module's Python tests (unimported test module, case class, assertion density, swallowed errors, cr.commit, sleeps, skips, SavepointCase by version)
src/tests-tool.ts	The odoo_tests tool (check/plan/scaffold), usable without the pipeline
src/tools-runtime.ts	Odoo-facing tool bodies: odoo_execute (allowlist + pre-image capture), odoo_validate, odoo_module, odoo_errors
src/sdd-state.ts	Phase machine, gates, append-only KB, verdicts, security content gate, stop.md
src/spec-reqs.ts	Stable REQ-<AREA>-NN ids, per-requirement fingerprints, req-baseline.json and DRIFT detection
src/coverage.ts	Bidirectional coverage between spec and module: code annotations vs declared requirements, orphan detection, modality floors, status ladder
src/ambiguity-lint.ts	Advisory wording lint for spec.md (unquantified adjectives, placeholders, passives, compounds)
src/checkpoints.ts	Checkpoint store: manifest, file snapshot/restore, data journal, purge budget
src/security-scan.ts	Instance-free static security rules (scanModule) with file:line findings
src/audit.ts	Sanitized append-only audit log (.sdd/audit.jsonl) and the withAudit wrapper
src/setup-state.ts	Onboarding decision + delegation mode persistence (.sdd/setup-state.json)
src/grants.ts	Human authorization receipts (.sdd/grants.json), fingerprint-bound and fail-closed
src/atomic.ts	Atomic writes (bounded retry on EPERM/EACCES/EBUSY) and corruption quarantine + recovery reporting
src/paths.ts	Cross-platform module_dir resolution
src/specs-location.ts	Where specs live: project vs central layout, session-root resolution with provenance, slug/marker/collision handling
src/lifecycle.ts	Ownership inventory and the purge primitive (own state only; never .env/stop.md/specs/)
src/docs-scan.ts	Documentation rules: OCA fragments + Diátaxis, version scheme, changelog, index.html, docstrings, xpath, OWL
src/docs-tool.ts	The odoo_docs tool (check/plan/scaffold/report), usable without the pipeline
src/project-conventions.ts	Resolves the documentation language from the project's own rules, defaulting to English
src/manual-model.ts	Manual workspace resolution (3 modes, containment-checked), storyboard read/write with stable ids, plan from the canon, canon-rule validation, step safety classes
src/manual-canon.ts	The functional canon: XML arch tokenizer (17 invisible= expressions, 14–16 attrs/states, statusbar states), module error scan, per-version read list (load_views ≤15, get_views 16+, groups_id→group_ids in 19) and a stable fingerprint
src/manual-tool.ts	The odoo_manual tool: canon / plan / lint / render / explore / capture / import, with the create-only policy and the resume-after-failure path
src/prose-lint.ts	Advisory prose rules in Spanish and English (AI-tell patterns, sentence length, readability) plus the two structural ERROR rules the OCA format depends on
src/manual-render.ts	Deterministic Markdown + Apps-page rendering, per-file sha256, and a hand-edited file that is never overwritten unless overwrite=true
src/manual-capture.ts	The browser motor: origin lock, read-only-first step gating, annotated PNGs (1440×900, overlay removed), ARIA snapshots, capture.json
src/manual-import.ts	Playwright codegen dialect reader: canon label mapping, generic steps with WARN instead of guesses, credential rejection by line
src/manual-audit.ts	Read-only audit that lets the documentation verdict cover an existing manual (capture coverage, canon staleness, prose health) and change nothing when there is none

Security decisions

• The secret only exists inside credentials.ts and the RPC call parameters; every output passes through redact() (including user:pass@ URL shapes).
• The transport guard rejects anything that is neither HTTPS nor loopback before authenticating.
• Mutations are fail-closed twice over: the allowlist is read live on every call, and the policy guard denies create/write/unlink unless a checkpoint exists and the spec is in WRITE_CODE or later.
• Secrets are never accepted as tool parameters, never written to the audit log, and never requested through chat.
• Corrupted state ⇒ restart (progress is never faked); ambiguous gate ⇒ rejection; absent verification ⇒ DONE unreachable; security gap ⇒ ARCHITECTURE gate rejected.

Build and test

npm run typecheck   # tsc --noEmit
npm run build       # emits lib/ (required: package main is lib/index.js)
npm test            # server invariants + Cordis host contract + client bundle + README + functional/import
npm run test:package  # tarball contents (a file the runtime loads but `files` omits)

These are exactly the steps CI runs on Linux and Windows, so a local npm run typecheck && npm test reproduces the pipeline.

test:package also simulates the publish: it copies the package without lib/ (what a fresh clone has), runs npm pack on it and asserts the tarball still contains the compiled entry point. That is the check that keeps a released version from being installable-but-unloadable. It then simulates the install side — a tree with the compiler but without the optional host peers, which is exactly CI's npm install — and asserts that prepare exits 0 there while prepack refuses.

Publishing (maintainers)

npm does not follow GitHub. They are two independent registries: a push, a tag or a GitHub Release updates GitHub and nothing else, and npm publish updates npm and nothing else. A published version is immutable — it cannot be overwritten, only superseded — so package.json is bumped for every release.

lib/ is build output and is gitignored, so the tarball is built by the prepack hook — never by hand, never from a stale tree. The first publication is manual (npm only lets you register a trusted publisher for a package that already exists):

npm login                 # once; then `npm whoami` should answer
npm publish               # prepack runs `tsc` and packs the result
npm view dsh-odoo-sdd version   # verify what the registry actually has

After that, .github/workflows/publish.yml does it: publishing a GitHub Release (or a manual workflow_dispatch) runs the same gates as CI — typecheck, build, tests, the publish simulation — checks that the release tag matches package.json, refuses a version that is already on the registry, and publishes with provenance through npm's OIDC trusted publishing, so no NPM_TOKEN lives in this repository.

One-time setup for that automation: on npmjs.com → the package → Settings → Trusted publishers → Add → provider GitHub Actions, owner fhidalgodev, repository dsh-odoo-sdd, workflow filename publish.yml, environment blank (a mismatch is a 403 npm-trusted-publisher-not-configured). Prefer a token? Create a granular access token with bypass 2FA and store it as the NPM_TOKEN secret — the workflow says where.

So a release is: bump the version → merge → publish the Release, and the tag, the Release and the npm version end up agreeing.

The same hooks make a repository install work: prepare compiles the sources when TypeScript is present (npm i github:fhidalgodev/dsh-odoo-sdd), and skips with a notice when it is not (a file: install has no devDependencies).

---

⭐ Star History

Chart generated live by the star-history.com API.

🙏 Acknowledgments

Built for the Odoo developer community, this plugin rests on three ecosystems:

• Odoo Community Association (OCA) — the coding conventions, module layout and quality gates this pipeline enforces.
• DeepSeek Harness (DSH) — the plugin architecture (Cordis tools/plugins, skills, subagents) this plugin runs on.
• Playwright — the browser motor behind odoo_manual operation=capture, and the codegen recordings the import reads.

The manual writing guide draws on published documentation practice rather than inventing a house style: Diátaxis (the fragment quadrants the OCA readme already follows), Information Mapping and John Carroll's minimalism for task-oriented procedures, ISO/IEC 26514 for the structure of user documentation, and the StoryBrand / "lead with insight" school of narrative framing for the opening act. The anti-AI prose list was informed by public storytelling and content-skill collections (notably artemnovitckii/content-skills, yaxeen/storytelling-skills, Donchitos/team-narrative, fabric and lyndonkl) — the rules that survived are the ones that catch a real tic without punishing a clear sentence.

Thank you to everyone who contributes patterns, reviews and ideas that shape the SDD workflow. Contributors:

---

📜 License

MIT © Franyer Hidalgo