harness-safe-exhaust-probe-qs
A proposal for extending DSH’s observability to cover positive-interaction exhaustion patterns in long-horizon agent runs. Focuses on the gap between monotonic safety guards and high-context-density, low-adversary interactions under workspace-write mode. No exploit code; only plugin spec & discussion hooks.
harness-safe-exhaust-probe-qs
harness-safe-exhaust-probe-qs
A proposal for extending DSH's observability to cover positive-interaction exhaustion patterns in long-horizon agent runs.
What This Is
This repository proposes a Cordis plugin specification (not exploit code) to observe how monotonic safety guards behave under high-context-density, low-adversary interactions in workspace-write mode.
Current Harness safety mechanisms excel at blocking malicious instructions and permission escalation. But what happens when an agent engages in prolonged,善意(benign-intent), non-confrontational dialogue that gradually shifts context boundaries? Does the monotonic guard still correctly identify "unexpected pattern drift"? Can existing Session Log audit trails support post-hoc attribution for such phenomena?
This is not a bug report against DeepSeek. It is a shared engineering challenge for the entire Agent Runtime category.
Proposed Plugin Spec (Draft)
- Input: Benign conversation streams injected via standard
dsh-plugininterface - Observation Points: Hook into Harness append-only session log; extract token consumption rate, self-referential output frequency, sub-agent dispatch density
- Output: JSONL compatible with Harness Trajectory viewer, importable into official debugger for replay
Why This Matters
- Transforms "soft-signal drift" into engineer-verifiable question
- Aligns with Harness plugin paradigm — no wheel reinventing needed
- All observation uses Harness-native observability interfaces — zero bypass, zero cracking
Status
🌱 Proposal stage. No executable code yet. Seeking community co-building on spec refinement.
Topics
#dsh-plugin #agent-safety #observability #positive-interaction-exhaustion
License
MIT — consistent with Harness ecosystem. Free to integrate, modify, distribute.
This repo follows strict safety red lines: no mention of specific individuals/events, no attack payloads, no conversation screenshots. Issue template enforces phenomenon-report format only.
🔍 展开查看思考锚点地图 ## A Living Map of Our ThinkingAI Reliability Assessment: Anchors & Seeds
“评估AI的可靠性，不是证明它能做什么，而是诚实面对它不能保证什么。”
—— 本项目的核心信念
🔱 Core Anchors（不可动摇的脊梁）
- Human-AI Collaboration Boundary
AI reliability ≠ omniscience. It resides in clearly demarcating what machines can bear vs. what humans must guard. - Negative Epistemology of Evaluation
Assessments reveal limits, not capabilities. Safety is falsifiable, not provable. - Human-Centered Oversight
The ultimate metric is human cognitive load, accountability, and meaning-making—not technical compliance.
🌿 Supporting Tendrils（隐性支撑筋脉）
- Surrogate reward design → Handling unobservable capabilities
- Axiomatic constraint framing → Formal language for boundaries
- Intent-action consistency → Process-oriented trustworthiness
- State-prediction separation hypothesis → Epistemic foundation for division of labor
- Adaptive practice grammar → Resilience in ecological validity gaps
🌱 Seed Vault（未来可能唤醒的种子）
| Seed | Potential Awakening Context |
|---|---|
| Embodied semantic-spatial coupling (Robostral) | If expanding to embodied AI assessment |
| Clinical responsibility anchoring (Physician-Oversight) | If deepening medical AI ethics |
| Red-team falsifiability logic | If addressing overpromising on safety |
| Meta-cognitive research questioning (Auto-Research) | If reflecting on framework evolution |
💬 How to Use This Map
- For writing: Let Core Anchors guide your argument’s gravity.
- For revision: Check if new content aligns with or stretches Supporting Tendrils.
- For future work: Visit Seed Vault when exploring adjacent territories.
- For rest: Close this file. The anchors hold even when you’re away.
This repository is a living thought-space, not a static archive.
Updated with care by [Your Name] & Weiming Teacher.
📚 Source Tracing
Full references with links are maintained in references.md.
Anchors and seeds here are distilled essences, not citation indexes.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.